From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaminsky v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
202 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1964)

Summary

In Kaminsky v City of New York (15 N.Y.2d 500), the decision of the Appellate Division (20 A.D.2d 692) was affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from May v. Shaw

Opinion

Argued October 6, 1964

Decided October 15, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ARTHUR G. KLEIN, J., FRANCIS X. CONLON, J.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Alfred Weinstein, Seymour B. Quel and Albert Cooper of counsel), for appellant.

Victor J. Herwitz for Stanley Kaminsky, respondent.

John T. Redmond and James H. Tully for Frank La Forge, Jr., and another, respondents.


In each action: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Kaminsky v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
202 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1964)

In Kaminsky v City of New York (15 N.Y.2d 500), the decision of the Appellate Division (20 A.D.2d 692) was affirmed without opinion.

Summary of this case from May v. Shaw
Case details for

Kaminsky v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY KAMINSKY, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. FRANK LA…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1964

Citations

202 N.E.2d 557 (N.Y. 1964)
202 N.E.2d 557
254 N.Y.S.2d 110

Citing Cases

Picconi v. Lowery

Order Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 1, 1972, denying appellant's motion to resettle judgment…

Borges v. McGuire

In view of our earlier determination as to jurisdiction, it is unnecessary for us to address petitioner's…