From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaminsky v. American Newspapers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1938
255 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

November 28, 1938.


Action for libel. Judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the trial justice unduly participated in the cross-examination of the plaintiff and his witnesses, and his inquiries, by their prejudicial tenor, coupled with many prejudicial comments, deprived the plaintiff of a fair trial. Lazansky, P.J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaminsky v. American Newspapers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1938
255 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Kaminsky v. American Newspapers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE KAMINSKY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN NEWSPAPERS, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Goldbard v. Kirchik

The trial was interspersed with prejudicial remarks and comments by the Trial Judge and with unnecessary…

Gerichten v. Ruiz, Welsbach Electric Corp.

In our view, the totality of the court's intercessions on behalf of the respondent and its cross-examinations…