From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalina v. General Hospital of City of Syracuse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1963
13 N.Y.2d 1023 (N.Y. 1963)

Summary

In Kalina, the plaintiffs, an observant Jewish couple, gave express instructions to the defendant hospital that their newborn son was to be ritualistically circumcised on his eighth day by a mohel in accordance with the tenets of their religion.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Jamaica Hosp

Opinion

Argued October 30, 1963

Decided November 21, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, J. ROBERT LYNCH, J.

Donald N. Fitzer for appellants.

Robert B. Simonton for respondents.

Mitchell S. Fisher and Eugene A. Brodsky for New York Board of Rabbis and another, amici curiae.


Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS FOSTER and SCILEPPI. Judges FULD and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse and to deny the motion to dismiss the complaint on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Kalina v. General Hospital of City of Syracuse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1963
13 N.Y.2d 1023 (N.Y. 1963)

In Kalina, the plaintiffs, an observant Jewish couple, gave express instructions to the defendant hospital that their newborn son was to be ritualistically circumcised on his eighth day by a mohel in accordance with the tenets of their religion.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Jamaica Hosp
Case details for

Kalina v. General Hospital of City of Syracuse

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH KALINA, Appellant, v. GENERAL HOSPITAL OF THE CITY OF SYRACUSE et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 21, 1963

Citations

13 N.Y.2d 1023 (N.Y. 1963)
245 N.Y.S.2d 599
195 N.E.2d 309

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Jamaica Hosp

There is no basis for establishing such a direct duty. This court has refused to recognize such a duty on the…

Di Michele v. Filacchione

In the Battalla case, the defendant's negligent act resulted in the fright of the infant plaintiff herself…