From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalb v. Fisher

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
144 A. 919 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided February 4, 1929.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 5 N.J. Mis. R. 977.

For the respondent, Silberman Grossman.

For the appellant, Nathan H. Berger.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kalb v. Fisher

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
144 A. 919 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Kalb v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:ANNA KALB, RESPONDENT, v. MORRIS FISHER, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 4, 1929

Citations

144 A. 919 (N.J. 1929)
144 A. 919

Citing Cases

Coyne v. Mutual Grocery Co., Inc.

In the absence of such proof, the legal presumption of due care obtains. Schnatterer v. Bamberger Co., 81…

Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

The injuries complained of were sustained as the result of a fall in defendant's store due to slipping on a…