From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kakinami v. Kakinami

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
May 11, 2011
125 Haw. 30 (Haw. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

holding that family court did not err in finding that wife spent certain funds for "ordinary and customary household and living expenses" — including attorneys' fees, expenses incident to purchasing and setting up a new home, and vacations—and noting that while husband submitted testimony and evidence "that could give rise to an inference of dissipation," the family court was entitled to weigh conflicting evidence and make credibility determinations

Summary of this case from JW v. LW

Opinion

No. 29340.

May 11, 2011.


Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kakinami v. Kakinami

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
May 11, 2011
125 Haw. 30 (Haw. Ct. App. 2011)

holding that family court did not err in finding that wife spent certain funds for "ordinary and customary household and living expenses" — including attorneys' fees, expenses incident to purchasing and setting up a new home, and vacations—and noting that while husband submitted testimony and evidence "that could give rise to an inference of dissipation," the family court was entitled to weigh conflicting evidence and make credibility determinations

Summary of this case from JW v. LW
Case details for

Kakinami v. Kakinami

Case Details

Full title:Kakinami v. Kakinami

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

125 Haw. 30 (Haw. Ct. App. 2011)
251 P.3d 47

Citing Cases

Kakinami v. Kakinami

The ICA affirmed. Kakinami v. Kakinami, No. 29340, 2011 WL 1836718, at *4 (Haw.Ct.App. May 11, 2011) (SDO).…

JW v. LW

Finally, Mother appears to contend that Father's HELOC expenditures for his own expenses constitute waste…