From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kafa Invs., LLC v. 2170-2178 Broadway LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2014
114 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-4

KAFA INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. 2170–2178 BROADWAY LLC, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York (Eliott Berman of counsel), for appellants. Franklin R. Kaiman, New York, for respondents.


McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York (Eliott Berman of counsel), for appellants. Franklin R. Kaiman, New York, for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 23, 2013, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In the agreement governing plaintiffs' sale of their interest in an entity that owned certain hotels to defendants, the co-owners of the entity, plaintiffs released defendants from “any and all claims” “known and unknown.” That language bars this action for fraud arising from the alleged intentional misrepresentation of the value of the entity and the interest (Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., 17 N.Y.3d 269, 929 N.Y.S.2d 3, 952 N.E.2d 995 [2011] ). That defendants arguably are fiduciaries of plaintiffs does not invalidate the release, since they negotiated across the table from plaintiffs, who are sophisticatedparties represented by counsel ( see id. at 278, 929 N.Y.S.2d 3, 952 N.E.2d 995). TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, DeGRASSE, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kafa Invs., LLC v. 2170-2178 Broadway LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2014
114 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Kafa Invs., LLC v. 2170-2178 Broadway LLC

Case Details

Full title:KAFA INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. 2170–2178…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 433
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 619

Citing Cases

Silver Point Capital Fund v. Riviera Res.

For the same reason, the special facts doctrine also does not apply (see Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. v Berryman &…

Silver Point Capital Fund v. Riviera Res.

For the same reason, the special facts doctrine also does not apply (see Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. v Berryman &…