From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K & G Feathered Pets, Inc. v. Lo Presti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1984
100 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

April 16, 1984


In an action for a declaratory judgment, Michigan Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.), entered January 28, 1983, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that it afforded insurance coverage to plaintiffs for a motor vehicle accident which occurred on September 8, 1980. ¶ Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. ¶ The rules of the New York Automobile Plan (the Assigned Risk Plan) in effect at the time of cancellation herein for nonpayment of a premium installment required that the notice of cancellation inform the insured of its right to appeal to a committee established pursuant to the plan. The printed notice contained 10 notification paragraphs, each preceded by a blank box; one of these paragraphs informed the insured of the right to appeal. However, although a legend at the top of the body of the form stated "(Applicable item marked [X])", the box applicable to the paragraph relating to the right to appeal was left unmarked. Therefore the notice of cancellation did not include the requisite notice of the right to appeal and the policy remained in effect at the time of the accident (see Daniel v Rivera, 93 A.D.2d 877). Titone, J.P., Lazer, Mangano and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

K & G Feathered Pets, Inc. v. Lo Presti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1984
100 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

K & G Feathered Pets, Inc. v. Lo Presti

Case Details

Full title:K G FEATHERED PETS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. CATHERINE LO PRESTI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Roth v. Aetna Life and Casualty Insurance Co.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the plaintiffs. We agree…

Olshan v. Greater New York Mutual Ins. Co.

In this action for wrongful cancellation of an insurance policy, defendant insurer's notice of cancellation…