From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K. Bell v. Lloyd's Underwriters

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 10, 1997
129 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 1997)

Summary

dismissing appeal based on parties' agreement that their dispute about application of Boren requirements was mooted as of the effective date of the Boren Amendment's repeal

Summary of this case from Florida Assoc. Rehab. v. State of Florida

Opinion

No. 97-7397.

November 10, 1997.

Appeal from the S.D.N.Y.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

K. Bell v. Lloyd's Underwriters

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 10, 1997
129 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 1997)

dismissing appeal based on parties' agreement that their dispute about application of Boren requirements was mooted as of the effective date of the Boren Amendment's repeal

Summary of this case from Florida Assoc. Rehab. v. State of Florida

noting burden on the appellant to provide "an acceptable alternative means of securing the judgment"

Summary of this case from PERLES v. KAGY
Case details for

K. Bell v. Lloyd's Underwriters

Case Details

Full title:K. Bell Associates, Inc. v. Lloyd's Underwriters

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1997

Citations

129 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Gyadu v. Workers' Compensation Com'n

See Gyadu v. Chairman, Workers' Compensation Comm'n, No. 122258, 1994 WL 711199 (Conn.Super.Ct. Dec.9, 1994).…

WIDJAJA v. KANG YUE USA CORPORATION

Imposing this duty on defendants is reasonable, as the employer is obviously in the best position to know the…