From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.W. Hutchins Co. v. Ford Motor Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 15, 1925
7 F.2d 1019 (8th Cir. 1925)

Summary

In Hutchins v. Ford, 82 Me. 370, 19 A. 834, it is said: "The law is now well settled that disaster, caused by a peril insured against, as stranding or collision, resulting from negligence of the master or mariners, is covered by a policy of marine insurance."

Summary of this case from Mannheim Ins. Co. v. Charles Clarke Co.

Opinion

No. 6999.

May 15, 1925.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

William H. Oppenheimer, George W. Peterson, Frederick N. Dickson, and Frank Hodgson, all of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error.

William D. Mitchell, of Washington, D.C., and Wilfrid E. Rumble and Charles Bunn, both of St. Paul, Minn., for defendant in error.


Writ of error dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.


Summaries of

J.W. Hutchins Co. v. Ford Motor Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
May 15, 1925
7 F.2d 1019 (8th Cir. 1925)

In Hutchins v. Ford, 82 Me. 370, 19 A. 834, it is said: "The law is now well settled that disaster, caused by a peril insured against, as stranding or collision, resulting from negligence of the master or mariners, is covered by a policy of marine insurance."

Summary of this case from Mannheim Ins. Co. v. Charles Clarke Co.
Case details for

J.W. Hutchins Co. v. Ford Motor Company

Case Details

Full title:J.W. HUTCHINS CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 15, 1925

Citations

7 F.2d 1019 (8th Cir. 1925)

Citing Cases

Nute v. Fry

(3) The court erred in permitting Dr. Scott and Dr. Long to answer the hypothetical question. State v. Bell,…

Mannheim Ins. Co. v. Charles Clarke Co.

In 3 Cooley's Ins. 2883, are cited many cases where a grounding of a vessel in a harbor was deemed a peril of…