From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Junius v. Eberlin

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 28, 2009
122 Ohio St. 3d 53 (Ohio 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-0095.

Submitted May 19, 2009.

Decided May 28, 2009.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 08 BE 27, 2008-Ohio-6441.

Robert C. Junius Jr., pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Samuel Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Robert C. Junius Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus to compel his release from prison. Habeas corpus is not available to remedy claims concerning the validity of an indictment. State ex rel. Tarr v. Williams, 112 Ohio St.3d 51, 2006-Ohio-6368, 857 N.E.2d 1225, ¶ 4. Moreover, Junius's reliance on State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008-Ohio-1624, 885 N.E.2d 917 (" Colon I"), is misplaced, because our holding in that case "is prospective in nature and applies only to those cases pending on the date Colon I was announced." State v. Colon, 119 Ohio St.3d 204, 20()8-Ohio-3749, 893 N.E.2d 169, ¶ 5. Insofar as Junius claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, that claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Casey v. Hudson, 113 Ohio St.3d 166, 2007-Ohio-1257, 863 N.E.2d 171, ¶ 3. Finally, Junius had adequate legal remedies to raise his claim of actual innocence. See Shie v. Leonard (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER. LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Junius v. Eberlin

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 28, 2009
122 Ohio St. 3d 53 (Ohio 2009)
Case details for

Junius v. Eberlin

Case Details

Full title:JUNIUS, APPELLANT, v. EBERLIN, WARDEN, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 28, 2009

Citations

122 Ohio St. 3d 53 (Ohio 2009)
2009 Ohio 2383

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Hudson

As the court of appeals properly held, habeas corpus is not available to raise Wilson's various claims. See…

McDougald v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

His claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Pishok v. Kelly, 122 Ohio St.3d 292, 2009-Ohio-3452, 910…