From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

June v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
550 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-17776 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00901-SRB

12-24-2013

MARLENE JUNE, Conservator for minor and surviving son of deceased in his own right and on behalf of all statutory beneficiaries conservator for A.K.B. deceased, Anthony Edward Booth, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding


Submitted December 20, 2013

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
--------

Plaintiff Marlene June, acting as conservator for A.K.B., ("June") appeals the district court's judgment in favor of the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse and remand. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of the case, we will not recount it here.

After the district court entered judgment, an en banc panel of this Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) of the Federal Tort Claims Act is not jurisdictional and that equitable adjustment of the limitations period in that section is not prohibited. Wong v. Beebe, -- F.3d ---, 2013 WL 5539621 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), overruling Marley v. United States, 567 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2009). In light of Wong, we must reverse the district court's contrary ruling and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

We need not, and do not, reach any other issue urged by the parties on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

June v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 24, 2013
550 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

June v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARLENE JUNE, Conservator for minor and surviving son of deceased in his…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

Citations

550 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Wages v. United States

          HOWARD R. LLOYD, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE          In briefing on defendant’s pending motion…

Wages v. United States

Defendant United States of America moved to dismiss the case on the ground that plaintiff did not timely…