affirming the district court's denial of a motion to amend the complaint because the amended claim would be subject to dismissal and the proposed amendment was therefore futile
Summary of this case from FERNANDEZ v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.No. 97-1799.
June 26, 1998.
Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 701 So. 2d 223.
affirming the district court's denial of a motion to amend the complaint because the amended claim would be subject to dismissal and the proposed amendment was therefore futile
Summary of this case from FERNANDEZ v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.Full title:JUMONVILLE ET VIR v. CITY OF KENNER
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 26, 1998
As to the argument that the students might perceive the school to be endorsing religion, a factor established…
Whitbeck v. ChampagneThe buyer refused to complete the sale for the negotiated price of $525,000.00, the value of the property in…