From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Malick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 7, 2021
340 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

12-07-2021

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. Abu Hashem MALICK

Brian D. Rich and Logan A. Carducci, Hartford, in support of the petition.


Brian D. Rich and Logan A. Carducci, Hartford, in support of the petition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 208 Conn. App. 38, ––– A.3d ––––, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court incorrectly determine that an objection to an affidavit of debt is sufficient to challenge the affidavit under Practice Book § 23-18 (a), when the named defendant failed to advance any evidence as to the amount of the debt?"


Summaries of

JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Malick

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 7, 2021
340 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Malick

Case Details

Full title:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. Abu Hashem MALICK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

340 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)
340 Conn. 912

Citing Cases

JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Malick

The plaintiff sought certification to appeal to this court, which we granted, limited to the issue of whether…