From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Asure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01255 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01255

08-21-2012

GEORGE JOSEPH, Plaintiff v. WARDEN DONNA ASURE, et al., Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Smyser)


ORDER

Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Smyser's Report and Recommendation that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims and that Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 46.) No timely objections have been filed.

ACCORDINGLY, on this 21st day of August 2012, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Magistrate Judge Smyser's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 46) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims;
3. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED;
4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims; and
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

______________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Joseph v. Asure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01255 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Joseph v. Asure

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE JOSEPH, Plaintiff v. WARDEN DONNA ASURE, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01255 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

Horan v. Collins

However, Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment as to claims for punitive or nominal damages, as the…