From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph P. Suchy, Inc. v. Stuerzel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 2, 1975
82 Misc. 2d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)

Opinion

May 2, 1975

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, BENJAMIN F. NOLAN, J.

Davies, Hardy, Ives Lawther (Raymond T. Munsell of counsel), for appellants.

Edward A. Cunningham for respondents.
Cardo Sforza (Henry D. Sforza of counsel), for Florence Stuerzel, respondent.


Defendant Waldenmaier's motion for summary judgment was granted on the ground that the action was commenced by plaintiff funeral parlor more than four years after the funeral involved (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2725). The essence of the contractual relationship between the plaintiff and defendants is one in which service predominates and the furnishing of a casket was but an incidental feature of the transaction. Thus, the transaction is not a sale within the ambit of the Uniform Commercial Code (Perlmutter v Beth David Hosp., 308 N.Y. 100; Ben Constr. Corp. v Ventre, 23 A.D.2d 44; Schnectady Steel Co. v Trimpoli Constr., 43 A.D.2d 234; Wise Co. v Rand McNally Co., 195 F. Supp. 621 [SDNY, 1961], but one for services. The six-year Statute of Limitations applies to such a transaction (CPLR 213).

Order entered November 7, 1974 (NOLAN, J.) reversed, with $10 costs against defendant Waldermaier and motion to dismiss the complaint and cross complaint denied in all respects.

Concur: MARKOWITZ, P.J., FRANK and DUDLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Joseph P. Suchy, Inc. v. Stuerzel

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 2, 1975
82 Misc. 2d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)
Case details for

Joseph P. Suchy, Inc. v. Stuerzel

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH P. SUCHY, INC., Appellant, v. FLORENCE STUERZEL et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 2, 1975

Citations

82 Misc. 2d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)
370 N.Y.S.2d 316

Citing Cases

Perlmutter v. Don's Ford, Inc.

"The code applies to transactions involving goods, but its provisions, as with its predecessor, the Uniform…

Niagara Mohawk Power v. Graver Tank Mfg.

Hence, the contract does not fall within the ambit of the Code. See North American Leisure Corp. v. A B…