From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 30, 1942
178 Misc. 740 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)

Opinion

June 30, 1942.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the city of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann [ Walter P. Hickey of counsel], for the appellant.

William L. Standard [ Louis H. Rubinstein of counsel], for the respondents.


Section 170 of the Municipal Court Code does not authorize the taxation of disbursements incurred in resisting an application to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Even if the section expressly permitted taxation of the item in question, it would be unenforcible as an unauthorized restraint upon free access to the United States Supreme Court. ( Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Larabee, 234 U.S. 459.) The cost of printing briefs may not even be taxed as a disbursement in the United States Supreme Court ( Ex Parte Hughes, 114 U.S. 548; American Trust Co. v. Speers Sands Clay Works, 60 F. [2d] 994, 998).

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, SHIENTAG and MILLER, JJ.


Summaries of

Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 30, 1942
178 Misc. 740 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)
Case details for

Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J

Case Details

Full title:OLAF JORGENSEN AND OTHERS, Respondents, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1942

Citations

178 Misc. 740 (N.Y. App. Term 1942)
36 N.Y.S.2d 318

Citing Cases

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley

The superior court therefore erred in awarding that item of costs. ( People ex rel. Cooper v. Mitchell…