From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 21, 2006
No. 3:05-0513 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2006)

Opinion

No. 3:05-0513.

November 21, 2006


ORDER


Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 69), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 75), and Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 70).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 37) is DENIED and Defendants' Cross Motion for Judgment on the Merits (Docket No. 47) is GRANTED.

In its discretion, the Court finds that Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 70) is DENIED. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1); Secretary of Labor v. King, 775 F.2d 666, 669 (6th Cir. 1985).

This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jordan v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 21, 2006
No. 3:05-0513 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Jordan v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JASON JORDAN v. TYSON FOODS, INC., et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 21, 2006

Citations

No. 3:05-0513 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 21, 2006)

Citing Cases

Rosecrance Health Network v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.

Therefore, a reduction in hours is only a qualifying event if it results in loss of coverage. See, e.g.,…