From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Warlick

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 1, 1966
364 F.2d 828 (4th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 10340.

Submitted on Briefs March 18, 1966.

Decided August 1, 1966.

Ottis Mayo Jones on brief for appellant pro se.

William Medford, U.S. Atty., and Joseph R. Cruciani, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.


Jones appeals the disposition by summary judgment of his civil suit for damages against United States District Judge Wilson Warlick, FBI Agent Gordon S. Carr and Arthur Goodman, Jr., defense attorney at Jones' trial for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The complaint alleges that the defendants conspired at Jones' trial to deprive him of his right to a fair trial.

Judge Bell of this Court, sitting by designation in the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, ruled that the federal officials and attorney Goodman were immune from civil suit for the acts alleged. See Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564, 79 S.Ct. 1335, 3 L.Ed.2d 1434; Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 80 U.S. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646; Yaselli v. Goff, 2 Cir., 12 F.2d 396, 56 A.L.R. 1239, aff'd per curiam, 275 U.S. 503, 48 S.Ct. 155, 72 L.Ed. 395.

Without accepting any of Jones' characterizations of the alleged acts, we affirm the decision below for the reasons more fully stated in Judge Bell's thorough opinion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Jones v. Warlick

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 1, 1966
364 F.2d 828 (4th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Jones v. Warlick

Case Details

Full title:Ottis Mayo JONES, Appellant, v. Wilson WARLICK, Gordon S. Carr, and Arthur…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 1, 1966

Citations

364 F.2d 828 (4th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Vance v. Robinson

Section 1983 is in the opinion of this Court, not applicable. Mulligan v. Schlachter, 389 F.2d 231, 233 (6th…

Sullens v. Carroll

The court below awarded summary judgment on grounds that court-appointed counsel for defendants in federal…