Opinion
NO. 01-12-00827-CR
10-04-2012
FRANKLIN CARL JONES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 977894
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Franklin Carl Jones, was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated robbery. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03 (West 2011). We affirmed the trial court's judgment in an unpublished opinion. See Jones v. State, No. 01-04-00236-CR, 2005 WL 497323 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] March 3, 2005, no pet.) (not designated for publication). Our mandate issued on June 29, 2005. On July 2, 2012, Jones appealed the trial court's May 17, 2012 order denying his "Motion for Imcompetency [sic] Hearing," in which Jones requested "that the Court set aside the Judgment [sic] of Conviction [sic] entered in this cause and ORDER A NEW TRIAL [sic] on the merits."
Jones's notice of appeal was dated June 27, 2012, postmarked June 28, 2012, and file-stamped July 2, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b); Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Jones included a cover letter with the notice, stating that he had previously filed a notice of appeal using "the wrong statutes" and was therefore filing a "second Notice of Appeal." The record, however, contains only the notice of appeal dated June 27, 2012.
We lack jurisdiction over this attempted appeal. As an initial matter, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal unless a notice of appeal is filed in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Here, the only notice of appeal that appears in the record was filed-stamped on July 2, 2012—14 days after the deadline for filing a notice of appeal from the order denying Jones's motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a). Because the notice of appeal was untimely, we have no basis for jurisdiction over this appeal. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.
Further, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings, which are governed by Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525 n.8; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 901 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). "Courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of appeals." In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (internal citations omitted). Because Jones's conviction for the felony offense of aggravated robbery became final on June 29, 2005, we have no jurisdiction over this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).