From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 1990
559 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 1990)

Opinion

No. 73809.

March 15, 1990. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, James T. Carlisle, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Gary Caldwell, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler and John Tiedemann, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We have for review State v. Jones, 537 So.2d 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), wherein the district court certified the following question:

May evidence, obtained as a result of defendant's consent to search, be suppressed by the trial court as "coerced" upon the sole ground that the officer(s) boarded a bus (or other public transport) and randomly sought consent from passengers?
Id. at 154. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. For the reasons expressed in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 1989), we answer the certified question, as rephrased therein, in the affirmative, quash the decision of the district court, and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Bostick.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
May 24, 1990
559 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 1990)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY TOPHA JONES, ETC., PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 24, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 1990)

Citing Cases

Florida v. Bostick

Implausible as it may seem, that is precisely what the Florida Supreme Court does. It routinely grants review…