Summary
In Jones v. State, 707 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1998), the trial court had instructed the jury that "arresting the Defendant for possession of cocaine and/or drug paraphernalia constitutes lawful execution of a legal duty.
Summary of this case from State v. LongeOpinion
Case No. 96-01990.
Opinion filed January 9, 1998.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Charles W. Cope, Judge.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Frank D.L. Winstead, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Tracy L. Martinell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Larry D. Jones appeals from his judgment and sentence for resisting arrest without violence. We reverse because the trial court improperly instructed the jury on that offense.
The trial court erred in instructing the jury that "arresting the Defendant for possession of cocaine and/or drug paraphernalia constitutes lawful execution of a legal duty." By stating that Jones's arrest constituted the lawful execution of a legal duty, the trial court, in effect, took the issue of the lawfulness of his arrest from the jury and directed a verdict for the State. See Kyle v. State, 650 So.2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995),review denied, 659 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1995); Royster v. State, 643 So.2d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Hierro v. State, 608 So.2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., Concur.