From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Mar 16, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00437 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 16, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00437

03-16-2021

JOHNNIE L. JONES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on June 30, 2020, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 23, 2021, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 16) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document 13), grant the Defendant's Brief in Support of Defendant's Decision (Document 15), affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by March 9, 2021.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document 13) be DENIED, the Defendant's Brief in Support of Defendant's Decision (Document 15) be GRANTED, the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, and this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: March 16, 2021

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Jones v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Mar 16, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00437 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Jones v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE L. JONES, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00437 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Roshelle S.-B. v. Kijakazi

To the extent Plaintiff contends that the ALJ should have adopted a specific RFC endorsed by Plaintiff's…

Orion G. v. Kijakazi

However, “to the extent that Claimant contends the ALJ did not adopt an RFC assessment endorsed by his…