From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JONES v. LA VALLETTE

U.S.
Jan 1, 1866
72 U.S. 579 (1866)

Opinion

DECEMBER TERM, 1866.

A judgment in the Circuit Court of Louisiana in the ordinary action by petition and summons upon a promissory note cannot be brought into this court by appeal. It must come here, if at all, on writ of error.

Mr. Janin now moved to dismiss the appeal, contending that appeal was not the proper form of bringing up the case.

Mr. Durant, contra.


A JUDGMENT had been rendered in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, in favor of La Vallette against Jones, in the ordinary action by petition and summons, upon a promissory note. The defendants below took an appeal, seeking to bring the case into this court in that way.


The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave appellate jurisdiction to this court by writ of error, and it was held that under that act no cause could be brought here by appeal.

Blaine v. Ship Charles Carter, 4 Dallas, 22.

The act of 1803 gave appellate jurisdiction by appeal "from final judgments and decrees in cases of equity, of admiralty, and maritime jurisdiction, and of prize or no prize." No other cases can be brought here in this mode, and the case in the record is of neither class. It must come here, if at all, upon writ of error.

The appeal must therefore be

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

JONES v. LA VALLETTE

U.S.
Jan 1, 1866
72 U.S. 579 (1866)
Case details for

JONES v. LA VALLETTE

Case Details

Full title:JONES v . LA VALLETTE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1866

Citations

72 U.S. 579 (1866)

Citing Cases

Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United States

Consent will not give jurisdiction. Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 204; Barry v. Mercien, 5 How. 103; United…

United States v. Emholt

United States v. Lancaster, 5 Wheat. 434; Nelson v. Carland, 1 How. 265. The case cannot be treated as before…