From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Fuentes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2013
103 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-27

Barbara JONES, respondent, v. Ramon A. FUENTES, appellant.

McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y. (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for appellant. Debra Hirsch, Cedarhurst, N.Y. (Jeffrey Hirsch of counsel), for respondent.



McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y. (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for appellant. Debra Hirsch, Cedarhurst, N.Y. (Jeffrey Hirsch of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), entered March 23, 2012, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

CPLR 3215(c) requires that a plaintiff commence proceedings for the entry of a default judgment within one year after the default or demonstrate sufficient cause why the complaint should not be dismissed. Where the plaintiff has made an application to the court for the entry of a default judgment within one year of the defendant's default, the court may not later dismiss the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) ( see Nowicki v. Sports World Promotions, 48 A.D.3d 435, 436, 851 N.Y.S.2d 270;Brown v. Rosedale Nurseries, 259 A.D.2d 256, 257, 686 N.Y.S.2d 22;Home Sav. of Am., F.A. v. Gkanios, 230 A.D.2d 770, 770–771, 646 N.Y.S.2d 530;Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Reifler, 45 A.D.2d 488, 489, 359 N.Y.S.2d 820). Here, the plaintiff's original motion for leave to enter a default judgment was made and denied without prejudice within one year after the defendant's default. Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff demonstrated that she did not abandon the action ( see Allstate Ins. Co. v. Austin, 48 A.D.3d 720, 721, 851 N.Y.S.2d 375;Brown v. Rosedale Nurseries, 259 A.D.2d at 257, 686 N.Y.S.2d 22;Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Reifler, 45 A.D.2d at 489–490, 359 N.Y.S.2d 820;cf. Skeete v. Bell, 292 A.D.2d 371, 739 N.Y.S.2d 174). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned.


Summaries of

Jones v. Fuentes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2013
103 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Jones v. Fuentes

Case Details

Full title:Barbara JONES, respondent, v. Ramon A. FUENTES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
103 A.D.3d 853
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1239

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Daskal

CPLR 3215(c) provides that "[i]f the plaintiff fails to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one…

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Poku

In addition, contrary to Poku's contention, CPLR 3215(c) does not apply where, as here, the plaintiff's…