From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Conway

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 31, 2008
9:05-CV-0915 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)

Opinion

9:05-CV-0915 (LEK/DRH).

March 31, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on December 6, 2007 by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 16). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Petitioner Tremayne Jones, which were filed on Februayr 14, 2008. Objections (Dkt. No. 22).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tremayne Jones (Dkt. No. 5), is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Conway

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 31, 2008
9:05-CV-0915 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Jones v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:TREMAYNE JONES, Petitioner, v. JAMES CONWAY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

9:05-CV-0915 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

Valenko v. Artus

There is no distinction between liability as a principal and criminal culpability as an accessory and the…

Kirton v. Ercole

Since petitioner has not established that the challenged instruction misstated New York law regarding…