From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. City of Atlanta, 214 Fed.Appx. 972 (2006)

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 19, 2006
No. 06-12140-HH (11th Cir. Oct. 19, 2006)

Summary

holding that two Atlanta police officers who "were outside of their police jurisdiction when they allegedly violated [the plaintiff's] constitutional rights" were "not entitled to summary judgment grounded upon qualified immunity" because they "ha[d] not proven that they were acting within the scope of their discretionary authority"

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Ash

Opinion

No. 06-12140-HH.

October 19, 2006.

Appeal from the N.D.Ga., 192 Fed.Appx. 894.


Denial of Rehearing En Banc.


Summaries of

Jones v. City of Atlanta, 214 Fed.Appx. 972 (2006)

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 19, 2006
No. 06-12140-HH (11th Cir. Oct. 19, 2006)

holding that two Atlanta police officers who "were outside of their police jurisdiction when they allegedly violated [the plaintiff's] constitutional rights" were "not entitled to summary judgment grounded upon qualified immunity" because they "ha[d] not proven that they were acting within the scope of their discretionary authority"

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Ash

denying qualified immunity at summary judgment where the officers "ha[d] not proven that they were acting within the scope of their discretionary authority" since they "were outside of their police jurisdiction when they allegedly violated [the plaintiff's] constitutional rights"

Summary of this case from Rebalko v. City of Coral Springs
Case details for

Jones v. City of Atlanta, 214 Fed.Appx. 972 (2006)

Case Details

Full title:Jones v. City of Atlanta

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 2006

Citations

No. 06-12140-HH (11th Cir. Oct. 19, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Miller

See Kesinger ex rel. Estate of Kesinger v Herrington, 381 F.3d 1243, 1248 (11th Cir. 2004); Wood v. Kesler,…

Wilson v. Hinton

"'A government official acts within [her] discretionary authority if the actions were (1) undertaken pursuant…