From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council v. Healing

U.S.
Jun 3, 1963
373 U.S. 758 (1963)

Summary

Healing II

Summary of this case from Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.

No. 985.

Decided June 3, 1963.

Together with No. 1050, Healing, Chairman of Hopi Tribal Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, et al. v. Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe, et al., on appeal from the same Court.

210 F. Supp. 125, affirmed.

Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050.

John S. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee Healing in No. 985.



The motion to substitute Raymond Nakai in the place of Paul Jones as the party appellant in No. 985 and as a party appellee in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to substitute Abbott Sekaquaptewa in the place of Dewey Healing as a party appellee in No. 985 and as a party appellant in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to affirm in No. 985 is granted and the judgment which is common to both cases is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.


Summaries of

Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council v. Healing

U.S.
Jun 3, 1963
373 U.S. 758 (1963)

Healing II

Summary of this case from Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald
Case details for

Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council v. Healing

Case Details

Full title:JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, v …

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 3, 1963

Citations

373 U.S. 758 (1963)

Citing Cases

Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald

The 1934 Act does not affect the status of the 1882 Reservation, which is the subject of continuing…

Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald

In 1958, Congress enacted a statute authorizing either tribe to commence or to defend a quiet title action…