From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jointer v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2014
NO. SACV 13-01843 R (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NO. SACV 13-01843 R (SS)

03-10-2014

MICHAEL ANTHONY JOINTER, Petitioner, v. A.M. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,


CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE


JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

__________

MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jointer v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2014
NO. SACV 13-01843 R (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Jointer v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANTHONY JOINTER, Petitioner, v. A.M. GONZALES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 10, 2014

Citations

NO. SACV 13-01843 R (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Valentine v. Lewis

It is still possible, however, that petitioner will obtain such leave from the Ninth Circuit. The case,…

De Adams v. Hedgpeth

"Although AEDPA does not define the terms second or successive, ' the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit...…