From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnston v. Dopkins

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1856
6 Cal. 83 (Cal. 1856)

Opinion

         The appeal was taken by the plaintiff in this cause, from an order setting aside the report of a referee to take an account, and the judgment entered thereon in favor of plaintiff.

         COUNSEL

          Hager & Sharp, for Appellants.

          Bristol & Spencer, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court. Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         Where a referee is appointed merely to take an account between two parties, he bears simply the relation to the Court in which the case is pending, of a master in chancery under the English system. His report, stating the account, may be excepted to, and the exceptions sustained, or overruled; but whatever may be the order of the Court upon them, such order is merely interlocutory, and is not the subject of appeal before final judgment or decree; after final decree the action of the Court may be reviewed. This is a totally different case from that of a referee appointed, in the stead of the Court, to try and determine the cause.

         Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Johnston v. Dopkins

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1856
6 Cal. 83 (Cal. 1856)
Case details for

Johnston v. Dopkins

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSTON v. DOPKINS et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1856

Citations

6 Cal. 83 (Cal. 1856)

Citing Cases

Welsh v. Allen

         The order was made under § 385 Code Civ. Proc., and is interlocutory, and not an appealable order. (…

Riddle v. Baker

The order granting a new trial was revisable. (Pr. Act, Sec. 187; 6 Cal. 83; 4 Id. 122.) 2d. This suit…