From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 9, 2015
574 U.S. 1069 (2015)

Opinion

No. 13–7120.

01-09-2015

Samuel James JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


This case is restored to the calendar for reargument. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: "Whether the residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(B)(ii), is unconstitutionally vague." The supplemental brief of petitioner is due on or before Wednesday, February 18, 2015. The supplemental brief of the United States is due on or before Friday, March 20, 2015. The reply brief, if any, is due on or before Friday, April 20, 2015. The time to file amicus curiae briefs is as provided for by Rule 37.3(a). The word limits and cover colors for the briefs should correspond to the provisions of Rule 33.1(g) pertaining to briefs on the merits rather than to the provision pertaining to supplemental briefs. The case will be set for oral argument during the April 2015 argument session.


Summaries of

Johnson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 9, 2015
574 U.S. 1069 (2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Samuel James JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

574 U.S. 1069 (2015)
135 S. Ct. 939
190 L. Ed. 2d 718

Citing Cases

Wims v. United States

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1), (b)(6). First, Wims argued that the district court made a "mistake" by failing…

United States v. Wilson

RULING AND ORDERThis matter comes before the Court on the Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside,…