From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. United States

U.S.
Apr 5, 1971
401 U.S. 846 (1971)

Summary

striking portion of appellate brief that included matter outside the record

Summary of this case from Nuclear Information & Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 5247.

Argued March 24, 1971 Decided April 5, 1971

138 U.S.App.D.C. 174, 426 F.2d 651, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

William J. Lippman, by appointment of the Court, 400 U.S. 940, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Samuel Huntington argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Roger A. Pauley.


The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


In the petitioner's trial on a charge of rape, the District Judge instructed the jury that it could return a verdict of guilty with the death penalty. Yet that verdict was constitutionally impermissible in light of this Court's decision in United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570. See Bailey v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 82, 86 and n. 3, 405 F.2d 1352, 1356 and n. 3. I think the extreme prejudice arising from this erroneous instruction requires reversal of the judgment of conviction and a remand of this case for a new trial. Cf. Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323, 331-332.


Summaries of

Johnson v. United States

U.S.
Apr 5, 1971
401 U.S. 846 (1971)

striking portion of appellate brief that included matter outside the record

Summary of this case from Nuclear Information & Resource Service v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Case details for

Johnson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 5, 1971

Citations

401 U.S. 846 (1971)

Citing Cases

Zimmerman v. State

Addressing first the threshold issue, we hold that a criminal defendant is entitled to assert an alternative…

United States v. Wiley

In these circumstances, the traditional purpose of the corroboration requirement — avoidance of fabricated…