From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
760 F.2d 244 (11th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-5764.

April 24, 1985.

Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow Olin, P.A., Joel D. Eaton, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jeffrey D. Fisher, Spec. Asst. U.S. Atty., Linda Collins-Hertz, Jonathan Goodman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., Robert S. Greenspan, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Nicholas Stephen Zeppos, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Jose A. Gonzalez, Judge.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION [2] (Opinion January 10, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 749 F.2d 1530)


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc entered on March 26, 1985, 758 F.2d 660, and the prior panel's opinion are hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
760 F.2d 244 (11th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Johnson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FRIEDA JOYCE JOHNSON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HORTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 1985

Citations

760 F.2d 244 (11th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. United States

Cole at 877. Subsequent to our decision in Cole, we granted the government's suggestion that Johnson be…