From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Stocks

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 20, 1922
92 So. 457 (Ala. 1922)

Opinion

7 Div. 296.

April 20, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; W. J. Martin, Judge.

Motley Motley, of Gadsden, for appellant.

The verification was insufficient to establish a lien, and the court erred in admitting the statement in evidence. 117 Ala. 587, 23 So. 526; 107 Ala. 531, 18 So. 108. Counsel discuss other matters not treated of in the opinion.

Hood Murphree, of Gadsden, for appellee.

The verification was sufficient, and no error was committed in its admission. Section 4758, Code 1907; 87 Ala. 458, 6 So. 366; 200 Ala. 591, 76 So. 949.


This court has had occasion heretofore to point out that there is no inequity in requiring of the contractor, who would acquire a lien on the land of his debtor under article 1 of chapter 107 of the Code, that he comply strictly, in all matters of substance, with the requirements of the statute, under which alone he may have a lien. Globe Iron Roofing Co. v. Thacher, 87 Ala. 458, 6 So. 366. The verification by the plaintiff of the statement filed in the office of the judge of probate in this case was as follows:

"Before me, L. L. Herzberg, judge of probate, personally appeared O. J. Stocks, and, being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing statement is true, to the best of his knowledge and belief."

On its face this verification was, under the decisions of this court, insufficient, and the statement offered in evidence with this verification was incompetent. Long v. Pocahontas Coal Co., 117 Ala. 587, 23 So. 526; Florence Building Ass'n v. Schall, 107 Ala. 531, 18 So. 108.

For error in admitting the statement in evidence, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Stocks

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 20, 1922
92 So. 457 (Ala. 1922)
Case details for

Johnson v. Stocks

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. STOCKS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 20, 1922

Citations

92 So. 457 (Ala. 1922)
92 So. 457

Citing Cases

Foreman v. City of Anniston

Emerson Watson, Anniston, for appellee. The claim or statement for personal injury received required to be…

Powers v. Grayson

Every essential to the creation of a materialman's lien must be averred in a bill to enforce such a lien.…