From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 2, 1973
195 S.E.2d 754 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

47681, 47682.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 4, 1973.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 2, 1973.

Motions to suppress. Ware and Bacon Superior Courts. Before Judge Hodges.

Jones Rountree, George M. Rountree, for appellant.

Dewey Hayes, District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant appeals from the denial of his motions in two courts to suppress certain evidence alleged to have been illegally seized. Both courts certified the orders for immediate review.

There is insufficient probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant on its face. The affidavit states no factual reasons for the reliability of the unnamed informer nor any facts to support the reiterated, bare conclusion that the property was stolen. Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 ( 89 SC 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637); United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 ( 85 SC 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684); Marshall v. State, 113 Ga. App. 143 ( 147 S.E.2d 666). The record upon hearing does not support the State's contentions that the issuing magistrate had sufficient additional information or that there was a consent to search. The courts erred in denying the motions to suppress.

Judgment reversed. Evans and Clark, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED JANUARY 4, 1973 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 2, 1973.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 2, 1973
195 S.E.2d 754 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. THE STATE (two cases)

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 2, 1973

Citations

195 S.E.2d 754 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973)
195 S.E.2d 754

Citing Cases

Grant v. State

It would be nothing more than a bare conclusion. Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 ( 89 SC 584, 21…