From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-1367

Opinion filed June 4, 1997

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Richard D. Eade, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-22601 CF10A.

Gerald Johnson, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Gerald Johnson appeals an order denying his post-conviction motion in which he alleged reversible error and ineffective assistance of his appellate counsel. The trial court properly denied the motion, because neither allegation is a proper subject for a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

A claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the appellate court. Because rule 9.040(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, permits this court to treat a case as if the proper remedy had been invoked, we have treated this appeal as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and have considered the merits of Johnson's ineffective assistance claim. The petition is hereby denied.

STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALD JOHNSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 4, 1997

Citations

694 So. 2d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Nairn v. State

Affirmed. See Russell v. State, 740 So.2d 567, 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that the Florida Rules of…

Johnson v. State

This is because a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel…