From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Nello Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1990
159 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 12, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While the plaintiff's initial default in opposing the defendants' motion for summary judgment may have been the result of excusable law office failure (see, CPLR 2005), he failed to adequately justify his almost six-month delay in moving to vacate that default. He also failed to adequately demonstrate the existence of a meritorious claim or any valid opposition to the defendants' summary judgment motion (cf., Canter v Mulnick, 60 N.Y.2d 689). Therefore, we cannot say that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion (see, CPLR 5015) in denying the plaintiff's motion to vacate his default. Kooper, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Nello Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1990
159 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Johnson v. Nello Homes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. NELLO HOMES, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 562 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 425

Citing Cases

Queens Med. Supply, Inc. v. Hereford Ins. Co.

Nevertheless, in the case at bar, the vacatur of the default judgment upon the exercise of the Civil Court's…

Atl. Radiology Imaging, P.C. v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

As such excuse was vague, undetailed and unsubstantiated, it did not constitute a reasonable excuse for the…