From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Marvin

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jan 22, 2008
1:07CV278 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2008)

Opinion

1:07CV278.

January 22, 2008


O-R-D-E-R


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on October 24, 2007, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner filed a "Motion to Add More Evidence," which will be construed as objections to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss [Pleading No. 8] be GRANTED and that this action be dismissed as time-barred. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Marvin

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Jan 22, 2008
1:07CV278 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Marvin

Case Details

Full title:ZANE A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN MARVIN L. POLK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

1:07CV278 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Tapp-El v. Cooper

Petitioner's arguments lack merit. Paragraph (D) states that the one-year limitation period begins to run…