Summary
providing that an appellant challenging an interlocutory order shall include in its brief a statement which "must contain sufficient facts and argument to support appellate review on the ground that the challenged order affects a substantial right"
Summary of this case from Geoghagan v. GeoghaganOpinion
No. 158A05.
Filed October 7, 2005.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C. App. 515, 608 S.E.2d 336 (2005), dismissing as interlocutory an appeal from a partial summary judgment entered 9 June 2003 by Judge Howard E. Manning, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2005.
Hunter, Higgins, Miles, Elam Benjamin, PLLC, by Robert N. Hunter, Jr., for plaintiff-appellees. Ligon and Hinton, by George Ligon, Jr., for defendant-appellant Lucas.
AFFIRMED.
Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.