From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Carlock

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Mar 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:05cv181 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:05cv181.

March 8, 2006


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the complaint should be dismissed. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's civil rights claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The Plaintiff may refile his civil rights lawsuit if he satisfies the conditions set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The Plaintiff's possible habeas corpus claims arising out of the facts of this case are DISMISSED without prejudice. It is finally

ORDERED that all motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Carlock

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Mar 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:05cv181 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. Carlock

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY JOHNSON, #672124 v. MICHAEL CARLOCK, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:05cv181 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2006)

Citing Cases

Brothers v. Arave

The authorities uniformly recognize the above rule. Carlock v. Johnson, 165 Wis. 49, 160 N.W. 1053; Kull v.…