From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John Nuveen Co. v. Sanders

U.S.
Apr 19, 1976
425 U.S. 929 (1976)

Summary

remanding for reconsideration on the issue of scienter in light of Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelsder, requiring a plaintiff in a private suit for damages under Rule 10b-5 must show that the defendant acted with scienter

Summary of this case from In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative "ERISA" Litigation

Opinion

No. 75-1065.

April 19, 1976.


C.A. 7th Cir. Motions of Securities Industry Assn. and Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelder, ante, p. 185. MR. JUSTICE STEVENS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Reported below: 524 F. 2d 1064.


Summaries of

John Nuveen Co. v. Sanders

U.S.
Apr 19, 1976
425 U.S. 929 (1976)

remanding for reconsideration on the issue of scienter in light of Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelsder, requiring a plaintiff in a private suit for damages under Rule 10b-5 must show that the defendant acted with scienter

Summary of this case from In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative "ERISA" Litigation
Case details for

John Nuveen Co. v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:JOHN NUVEEN CO., INC., ET AL. v. SANDERS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 19, 1976

Citations

425 U.S. 929 (1976)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Cherry

Plaintiffs also rely upon approval of prejudgment interest by Federal courts or those of another State. In…

Wafra Leasing Corp. 1999-A-1 v. Prime Capital Corp.

monthly interest payment since May 2002, the record shows that there was a shortfall in the payment of…