From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yellow Cab Co.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Nov 26, 1954
16 F.R.D. 460 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

Summary

notwithstanding any attempt to make the duty to supplement continuing, "it may not be out of place for the Court to say at this time what should be obvious, namely, that the Defendant is bound to give truthful answers to the interrogatories and that both good faith and the spirit of the Rule require it to see to it that its answers are truthful as of the time of the trial as well as the time when the interrogatories are answered"

Summary of this case from In re E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

Opinion

         Defendant filed an objection to a certain sentence in introductory paragraph of interrogatories. The District Court, Kirkpatrick, Chief Judge, held that defendant was bound to give truthful answers to interrogatories and to see to it that its answers were truthful as of time of trial as well as of time when interrogatories were answered.

         Objection dismissed.

          Richter, Lord & Farage, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

          James J. Leyden, Philadelphia, Pa., for Yellow Cab Co.

         White, Williams & Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., for Verderame.


          KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

         The defendant has filed an objection to ‘ the last sentence of the introductory paragraph on page 1 of the interrogatories'. The sentence objected to is: ‘ These interrogatories shall be deemed continuing, so as to require supplemental answers if defendant obtains further information between the time answers are served and the time of trial’ .

         It is not necessary to pass upon the objection since it is not directed to any interrogatory but merely to a gratuitous statement by the plaintiff of his conception of the defendant's duty. However, it may not be out of place for the Court to say at this time what should be obvious, namely, that the defendant is bound to give truthful answers to the interrogatories and that both good faith and the spirit of the Rule require it to see to it that its answers are truthful as of the time of the trial as well as of the time when the interrogatories are answered.

         The objection is dismissed as not being directed to any interrogatory and not raising any issue which can be passed upon at this time.


Summaries of

Yellow Cab Co.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Nov 26, 1954
16 F.R.D. 460 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

notwithstanding any attempt to make the duty to supplement continuing, "it may not be out of place for the Court to say at this time what should be obvious, namely, that the Defendant is bound to give truthful answers to the interrogatories and that both good faith and the spirit of the Rule require it to see to it that its answers are truthful as of the time of the trial as well as the time when the interrogatories are answered"

Summary of this case from In re E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Case details for

Yellow Cab Co.

Case Details

Full title:John J. McNALLY and Lillian McNally, v. YELLOW CAB COMPANY, Defendant and…

Court:United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 26, 1954

Citations

16 F.R.D. 460 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

Citing Cases

Quatrano v. Marrocco

It has been so held in various decisions of the federal district courts, to be found in the Federal Rules…

Nathan v. Duncan

"The [party making answer] is bound to give truthful answers to the interrogatories and . . . both good faith…