From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.J. Flannery, Inc. v. Kerby Saunders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 1991
173 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 30, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.).


In this action brought by plaintiff subcontractor, J.J. Flannery, Inc., for breach of a sheet metal subcontract, Kerby, a heating ventilation and air conditioning contractor, argues that plaintiff's papers in opposition to its partial summary judgment motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The subcontract includes a "no damage for delay" clause, and the complaint's fourth and fifth causes of action seek damages and quantum meruit relief, respectively, as a consequence of defendant Kerby's alleged delays.

In view of the 25 month delay involved here, we find triable issues of fact exist warranting a trial, including whether the no-delay clause was intended by the parties to immunize defendant from its own alleged delay causing acts, where, as here, the aggregate delay period complained of was 25 months (Corinno Civetta Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 67 N.Y.2d 297 ).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

J.J. Flannery, Inc. v. Kerby Saunders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 1991
173 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

J.J. Flannery, Inc. v. Kerby Saunders, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:J.J. FLANNERY, INC., Respondent, v. KERBY SAUNDERS, INC., Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 30, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

PLATO GEN. CONSTR. CORP./EMCO TECH v. DORMITORY AUTH.

ing from delays in the performance of the contractor's work, a no-damage-for-delay clause may not be invoked…

Eaton Elec. v. Dormitory Auth. of State of York

rom delays in the performance of the contractor's work, such a no-damage-for-delay clause may not be invoked…