From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jim C. v. Arkansas Department of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 14, 1999
197 F.3d 958 (8th Cir. 1999)

Summary

granting rehearing en banc on waiver issue but leaving in place invalidation of abrogation

Summary of this case from Kilcullen v. New York State Dept. of Labor

Opinion

No. 98-1830

December 14, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.


ORDER

The petition of the United States of America for rehearing en banc is granted. This grant of rehearing en banc is limited to the spending clause issue raised by the petition. Those portions of the court's August 31, 1999, opinion and judgment covering the spending clause issue are vacated. The remainder of the court's opinion and judgment, including that portion of the opinion and judgment in Bradley v. Arkansas Dept. of Educ., 189 F.3d 745 (8th Cir. 1999) is unaffected by this order.

The clerk is directed to set this case on the court en banc's calendar for oral argument on Friday, January 14, 2000. The case will be assigned twenty (20) minutes per side.

Counsel should immediately forward twenty-one (21) copies of their previously-filed briefs and appendices for distribution to the court en banc.


Summaries of

Jim C. v. Arkansas Department of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 14, 1999
197 F.3d 958 (8th Cir. 1999)

granting rehearing en banc on waiver issue but leaving in place invalidation of abrogation

Summary of this case from Kilcullen v. New York State Dept. of Labor
Case details for

Jim C. v. Arkansas Department of Education

Case Details

Full title:Jim C., et al., Appellees, v. Arkansas Department of Education, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 14, 1999

Citations

197 F.3d 958 (8th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Litscher

Litman v. George Mason University, 186 F.3d 544, 553 (4th Cir. 1999); Clark v. California, 123 F.3d 1267,…

Robinson v. Kansas

That portion of the opinion, however, has been vacated and reheard en banc. See Jim C. v. Arkansas Dept. of…