From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jewett v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 6, 2005
820 N.E.2d 385 (Ohio 2005)

Summary

In Wilkins v. Jewett, 139 Mass. 29, a provincial statute, providing that anyone building in Boston might set half his partition wall on his neighbor's land, was held to be not in force in Massachusetts because of its unconstitutionality.

Summary of this case from Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.

Opinion

No. 2004-1614.

Decided January 6, 2005.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-B-1389.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the parties' briefs,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that case Nos. 03-1676, 03-1713 and 04-1614 be consolidated for purposes of oral argument and decision.


Summaries of

Jewett v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 6, 2005
820 N.E.2d 385 (Ohio 2005)

In Wilkins v. Jewett, 139 Mass. 29, a provincial statute, providing that anyone building in Boston might set half his partition wall on his neighbor's land, was held to be not in force in Massachusetts because of its unconstitutionality.

Summary of this case from Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.
Case details for

Jewett v. Wilkins

Case Details

Full title:Jewett v. Wilkins

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 6, 2005

Citations

820 N.E.2d 385 (Ohio 2005)
820 N.E.2d 385
2005 Ohio 18

Citing Cases

Williams v. Parker

A judicial view of the subject which comes near being universal might well be deemed conclusive in…

Smoot v. Heyl

The police power of the legislature does not justify it in authorizing one man to appropriate and use the…