From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeppi v. Jeppi

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 19, 1941
179 Md. 698 (Md. 1941)

Summary

In Jeppi v. Jeppi, 179 Md. 698, 18 A.2d 207, 210, it was held that the husband's previous desertion of the wife was not a defense to the wife's subsequent adultery.

Summary of this case from Gilmore v. Gilmore

Opinion

[Nos. 13 and 14, January Term, 1941.]

Decided February 19th, 1941.

Divorce.

Decided February 19th, 1941.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE, J.).

Suit by Hannah Jeppi against Lawrence H. Jeppi for permanent alimony on the ground of abandonment, and cross-bill by defendant for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii on ground of adultery. From decrees dismissing bills of complaint, respective complainants appeal. Decree dismissing wife's bill affirmed, and decree dismissing husband's bill reversed and cause remanded.

The cause was argued before PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, JOHNSON, and DELAPLAINE, JJ.

Michael J. Manley for Hanna Jeppi.

Charles E. Moylan and Franklin P. Barrett for Lawrence H. Jeppi.


Unreported cases.

DELAPLAINE, J., dissents in No. 14 and concurs in No. 13.


Summaries of

Jeppi v. Jeppi

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Feb 19, 1941
179 Md. 698 (Md. 1941)

In Jeppi v. Jeppi, 179 Md. 698, 18 A.2d 207, 210, it was held that the husband's previous desertion of the wife was not a defense to the wife's subsequent adultery.

Summary of this case from Gilmore v. Gilmore
Case details for

Jeppi v. Jeppi

Case Details

Full title:HANNAH JEPPI v . LAWRENCE H. JEPPI LAWRENCE H. JEPPI v . HANNAH JEPPI

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Feb 19, 1941

Citations

179 Md. 698 (Md. 1941)
18 A.2d 207

Citing Cases

Saltzgaver v. Saltzgaver

This court has expressly and definitely decided heretofore that while the doctrine of recrimination in…

Gilmore v. Gilmore

If public policy permits a complete disregard of the fact that defendant committed adultery, such a policy…