From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeffries v. Wood

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1996
103 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1996)

Summary

holding habeas restriction prospective only

Summary of this case from In re Bittaker

Opinion

No. 95-99003

Argued and Submitted November 20, 1996 — San Francisco, California

Filed December 20, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Carolyn R. Dimmick, District Judge, Presiding.

D.C. No. CV-90-00925-CRD

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge, Alfred T. Goodwin, Mary M. Schroeder, Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen Reinhardt, Melvin Brunetti, Alex Kozinski, Thomas G. Nelson, Michael Daly Hawkins, A. Wallace Tashima, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

On August 29, 1996, the Court directed the parties to submit briefs on the question of whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("Act") applied to cases filed prior to the Act's effective date. This issue has been fully briefed and was submitted on oral argument on November 20, 1996.

A number of Ninth Circuit panels have stayed decisions pending resolution of this question. Accordingly, we have elected to announce our decision prior to issuing an opinion.

We hold that the amendments to Chapter 153 of Title 28 of the United States Code contained in Title I of the Act do not apply to cases filed in the federal courts of this Circuit prior to the Act's effective date of April 24, 1996. A full opinion detailing the rationale for our decision, along with a decision on the merits, will be forthcoming, together with any separate concurring or dissenting opinions which members of the en banc panel may wish to file.

Judges Goodwin, Brunetti and Hawkins dissent from the issuance of this order.


Summaries of

Jeffries v. Wood

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 20, 1996
103 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1996)

holding habeas restriction prospective only

Summary of this case from In re Bittaker

noting that a number of panels had stayed decisions pending resolution of a common question

Summary of this case from Hoeun Yong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Case details for

Jeffries v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK JAMES JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. TANA WOOD, Superintendent…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1996

Citations

103 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Silva v. Woodford

On June 24, 1996, the district court denied the motion but allowed an immediate appeal of that ruling. On…

Silva v. Woodford

On June 24, 1996, the district court denied the motion but allowed an immediate appeal of that ruling. On…