From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeffords v. Professional Builders/Remodelers Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he suffered when he fell off the roof of a private residence under construction. Supreme Court properly granted defendant Professional Builders' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The evidence clearly demonstrates that plaintiff was a special employee of Professional Builders at the time of his accident and injury (see, Lesanti v Harmac Indus., 175 A.D.2d 664; Jeras v East Mfg. Corp., 168 A.D.2d 889). On the key factors of control and direction of the work, it is uncontroverted that plaintiff reported to the Professional Builders job site on the days and at the times directed by the Professional Builders' foreman; that the foreman signed plaintiff's time sheets; that the foreman told plaintiff what work he was to perform; and that Professional Builders supplied the equipment and tools for that work. Further, no representative of the general employer, Pilot Temporaries, was present at the job site, and Professional Builders had the sole right to control plaintiff's work at that job site. Thus, as a matter of law, plaintiff was in the special employ of Professional Builders at the time of his accident.


Summaries of

Jeffords v. Professional Builders/Remodelers Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Jeffords v. Professional Builders/Remodelers Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER JEFFORDS, Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL BUILDERS/REMODELERS GROUP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 452

Citing Cases

Dyer v. Superintendent of Insurance

Dyer also points to cases from other jurisdictions in which polygraph evidence has been admitted. See Evans…

Dyer v. Superintendent of Ins.

Dyer attempts to distinguish Ingerson on the grounds that the examiner was available to testify and would…