From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jay Dee Tomfor Transportation v. Board of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-08398

Argued November 1, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

In consolidated tax certiorari proceedings pursuant to RPTL article 7 to review real property tax assessments for the tax years 1993-1994 through 1999-2000, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered July 26, 2000, which reduced the real property tax assessments on the subject property for each of the above tax years.

Alfred F. Samenga, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tara Talmadge of counsel), for appellants.

Murphy Lynch Gionis, P.C., East Norwich, N.Y. (Paul L. Damato of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the appraisal evidence submitted by the petitioner was adequate to sustain its burden of overcoming the presumption of validity attaching to the tax assessment (see, Matter of FMC Corp. v. Unmack, 92 N.Y.2d 179, 191). Once the initial burden was met, the presumption disappeared, and the court properly considered the entire record in order to arrive at a fair and realistic value for the subject property (see, Matter of P.G.C. Assocs. v. Assessors of Town of Riverhead, 270 A.D.2d 272, 273).

S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jay Dee Tomfor Transportation v. Board of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Jay Dee Tomfor Transportation v. Board of Assessors

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAY DEE TOMFOR TRANSPORTATION, respondent, v. BOARD OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

Sun Plaza Enterprises v. Tax Commission

There is no merit to the City's contention that the petitioner failed to meet its initial burden of proof in…

Canandaigua Nat'l Bank v. Brown

Contrary to respondents' further contention, the court's refusal to completely follow either appraisal was an…