Opinion
89028
08-02-2024
CLODUALDO JASSO-MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. MARIA RODRIGUEZ LARA, Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Stiglich, J.
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order determining that appellant made a prima facie showing that modifying custody is in the best interest of the parties' children, referring the parties to mediation regarding visitation, and setting a hearing if they are unable to come to an agreement at mediation. Second Judicial District Court, Family Division, Washoe County; Tamatha Schreinert, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(7) because it does not finally establish or modify custody of the parties' minor children. And no other statute or 1court rule appears to permit an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (providing that this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and
Appellant's pro se motion to accept documents and flash drive is denied. The clerk shall return the exhibits and flash drive received on July 26, 2024, unfiled. Given this dismissal, this court takes no action on appellant's pro se transcript request form or document filed July 31, 2024.
Pickering, J., Parraguirre, J.
Tamatha Schreinert, District Judge