From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jun 4, 2019
925 F.3d 605 (3d Cir. 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-3695

06-04-2019

David JAROSLAWICZ v. M&T BANK CORPORATION; Hudson City Bancorp Inc.; *The Estate of Robert G. Wilmers, by its Personal Representatives Elisabeth Roche Wilmers, Peter Milliken, and Holly McAllister Swett; Rene F. Jones; Mark J. Czarnecki; Brent D. Baird ; Angela C. Bontempo; Robert T. Brady; T. Jefferson Cunningham, III; Gary N. Geisel; John D. Hawke, Jr.; Patrick W.E. Hodgson; Richard G. King; Jorge G. Pereira; Melinda R. Rich; Robert E. Sadler, Jr.; Herbert L. Washington; Denis J. Salamone; Michael W. Azzara; Victoria H. Bruni; Donald O. Quest ; Joseph G. Sponholz; Cornelius E. Golding; William G. Bardel; Scott A. Belair Belina Family; Jeff Krublit, Appellants *(Amended pursuant to Clerk's Order dated 3/1/18)


SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Having been submitted to the remaining judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel filed by the appellee in the above-entitled case is granted. The opinion and judgment entered December 26, 2018 are hereby vacated. The merits panel is reconstituted in light of the retirement of the Honorable Thomas I. Vanaskie. The Honorable Paul B. Matey replaces Judge Vanaskie on the merits panel.

As the merits panel has granted panel rehearing, no further action will be taken by the en banc court. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing after disposition of the matter by the reconstituted merits panel.


Summaries of

Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jun 4, 2019
925 F.3d 605 (3d Cir. 2019)
Case details for

Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JAROSLAWICZ v. M&T BANK CORPORATION; HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC.; *THE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 4, 2019

Citations

925 F.3d 605 (3d Cir. 2019)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Arconic Inc.

After Oral Argument in this case, the Third Circuit decided Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp. , No. 17-3695, and…

Mills v. Nines

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), see also Atkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 605, 627 (4th Cir. 2019) (good cause requires…